On Jul 17, 2013, at 5:23 PM, Iain Sandoe <i...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > The PR is logged against Darwin, and (as Jakub points out in the PR thread) > indeed Darwin is missing a nonlocal_goto_receiver to restore the PIC reg in > code that uses it (most of the patch).
Darwin bits, Ok. Thanks. > However, there is a second issue, and (if I've understood things correctly) > this affects GOT targets too - thus there is a single non-darwin-specific > hunk for which I need approval for X86 as a whole. We look forward to an x86 person to review those bits.
