Hi Sandra, On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote > Or - maybe more acceptable - an optional warning, say > -Wportable-volatility, to warn about code for which separate > incompatbile definitions on different platforms (or between C > and C++) exist even within gcc. It would be usable for driver > code you want to be usable on different architectures, say, in > an OS commonly compiled with gcc, if you can think of some. :)
I like this idea, and this warning would add some real value for everyone. Therefore I added that option as part 5 of this patch series, I hope you don't mind :) I really hope that the GCC maintainers can accept this patch now, as the current state of -fstrict-volatile-bitfields is very painful to all of us. Regards Bernd Edlinger
gcc-4.9-portable-volatility.diff
Description: Binary data
