On 06/30/2013 09:24 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
Here is my third attempt at cleaning up -fstrict-volatile-bitfields.
Ping?
Part 1 removes the warnings and packedp flag. It is the same as in the
last version, and has already been approved. I'll skip reposting it
since the patch is here already:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00908.html
Part 2 replaces parts 2, 3, and 4 in the last version. I've re-worked
this code significantly to try to address Bernd Edlinger's comments on
the last version in PR56997.
Part 2: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00001.html
Part 3 is the test cases, which are the same as in the last version.
Nobody has reviewed these but I assume they are OK if Part 2 is approved?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00912.html
Part 4 is new; it makes -fstrict-volatile-bitfields not be the default
for any target any more. It is independent of the other changes.
Part 4: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00002.html
It seems that the change to the defaults in part 4 is still
controversial but my understanding based on discussion of the previous
version of the patches is that the maintainers were going to insist on
that as a condition of getting the other bug fixes in. From my
perspective, I'd be happy just to wrap up this patch series somehow or
another, so please let me know if there are additional changes I need to
make before this is suitable to check in.
-Sandra
