[PATCH] Fix for PR 57692

[Iyer, Balaji V]

Hello Everyone,
        This patch will fix a FAIL in one of the test cases for array 
notations. The reason for fail is that the array sizes were huge and thus it 
was causing a stack overflow. This patch should fix the issue. I am committing 
this patch as semi-obvious. I am willing to revert this change if anyone has 
objections.

2013-06-25  Balaji V. Iyer  <balaji.v.i...@intel.com>

        * c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c: Fixed a bug of stack
        overflow due to size of arrays.

Index: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c    (revision 
200413)
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c    (working copy)
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
 /* { dg-do run } */
 /* { dg-options "-fcilkplus" } */

-#define NUMBER 100
+#define NUMBER 20
 #if HAVE_IO
 #include <stdio.h>
 #endif

+float array4[NUMBER][NUMBER][NUMBER][NUMBER];
 int main(void)
 {
   int array[NUMBER][NUMBER], array2[NUMBER], array3[NUMBER], x = 0, y;
-  int x_correct, y_correct, ii, jj = 0;
-  float array4[NUMBER][NUMBER][NUMBER][NUMBER];
+  int x_correct, y_correct, ii, jj = 0, kk = 0, ll = 0;
   for (ii = 0; ii < NUMBER; ii++)
     {
       for (jj = 0; jj < NUMBER; jj++)


Thanks,

Balaji V. Iyer.