On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:33 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:48 AM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > If I'm reading things right, pass_update_address_taken is never actually > > used. > > > > Deleting it, I was able to still successfully bootstrap on > > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (using gcc-4.7.2-2.fc17.x86_64). > > > > The use of the pass appears to have been removed in: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/r164525 > > > > Should I remove it from trunk? > > I haven't settled for whether the current scheme of using TODOs is really > the best thing yet... (it probably is not). So I'd rather keep the pass > around.
Fair enough - thanks.
