On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:48 AM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote: > If I'm reading things right, pass_update_address_taken is never actually > used. > > Deleting it, I was able to still successfully bootstrap on > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (using gcc-4.7.2-2.fc17.x86_64). > > The use of the pass appears to have been removed in: > http://gcc.gnu.org/r164525 > > Should I remove it from trunk?
I haven't settled for whether the current scheme of using TODOs is really the best thing yet... (it probably is not). So I'd rather keep the pass around. Thanks, Richard. > 2013-06-05 David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> > > * tree-pass.h (pass_update_address_taken): Remove. > * tree-ssa.c (pass_update_address_taken): Remove. >
