On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 02:51:03PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> > Quality Data >> > ============ >> > >> > Priority # Change from Last Report >> > -------- --- ----------------------- >> > P1 1 + 1 >> > P2 68 + 3 >> > P3 11 - 7 >> > -------- --- ----------------------- >> > Total 80 - 3 >> >> How did you compile these numbers? The "Serious regressions" link on >> gcc.gnu.org results in a bug list with no P1 bugs and only 74 P2+P3 >> bugs. > > That is the 4.9 list, not 4.8 list.
Then the link on the homepage needs updating. It now has: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.8&target_milestone=4.6.4&target_milestone=4.7.3&target_milestone=4.8.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&priority=P1&priority=P2&priority=P3&bugidtype=include&list_id=57595 Ciao! Steven
