On 2013.03.16 at 14:51 +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Quality Data > > ============ > > > > Priority # Change from Last Report > > -------- --- ----------------------- > > P1 1 + 1 > > P2 68 + 3 > > P3 11 - 7 > > -------- --- ----------------------- > > Total 80 - 3 > > How did you compile these numbers? The "Serious regressions" link on > gcc.gnu.org results in a bug list with no P1 bugs and only 74 P2+P3 > bugs.
Works for me: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.9&target_milestone=4.6.4&target_milestone=4.7.3&target_milestone=4.8.0&target_milestone=4.9.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&priority=P1&priority=P2&priority=P3&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= 80 bugs found. ID▲ Sev Pri▲ Assignee▲ Status▲ Resolution Summary 54114 nor P1 unassigned NEW --- [4.8/4.9 Regression] variable-tracking performance regression from 4.8-20120610 to 4.8-20120701 49234 min P2 aldyh NEW --- [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning ... -- Markus
