Bruce Korb <bruce.k...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Richard Sandiford > <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> I think a patch for each directory will need posting separately for review >>> of such things as whether any imported / generated files are mistakenly >>> changed. >> >> So fixincludes/ separate from gcc/, and every library separate? OK. > > Separate? Seems pretty "inextricably intertwined" to me. > > Maybe I'm coming in too late in this conversation. > I'll just update the copyrights in the next few days. > It (fixincludes) has _certainly_ been updated every year of its existence. > (Probably ought not count the original shell script, though I did lift all > of its expressions....)
Well, the idea is that the script will do it (this year and hopefully future years). It would be nice to get the stage where this stuff is mostly automated and not much hassle. It was just a question of whether to submit the fixincludes/ and gcc/ parts as one patch (as I'd originally done) or as two separate patches. Two separate patches probably makes more sense and I think is what Joseph was suggesting. Richard
