On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:34:31AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Definitely not - that means to not preserve loops until after cprop. The goal
> is to preserve loops everywhere!
Yikes, sorry, it wasn't clear to me what PROP_loops really does. Anyway,
I think I have a better fix now. The problem is just that when removing
BB 4 (which was a header), we have to zap ->header and ->latch. We
already have code for this:
if (current_loops != NULL
&& e->src->loop_father->latch == e->src)
{
/* ??? Now we are creating (or may create) a loop
with multiple entries. Simply mark it for
removal. Alternatively we could not do this
threading. */
e->src->loop_father->header = NULL;
e->src->loop_father->latch = NULL;
}
but the thing is that when there are multiple latch edges, then
->latch is NULL. So we need to keep track of how many latch edges
the header has. Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64, ok for trunk?
Can I get rid of may_be_loop_header (and just use n_latch_edges > 0
instead at that one place) in a followup?
2012-11-29 Marek Polacek <[email protected]>
PR middle-end/54838
* cprop.c (bypass_block): Set header and latch to NULL when
BB has more than one latch edge.
(n_latches): New variable.
* gcc.dg/pr54838.c: New test.
--- gcc/cprop.c.mp 2012-11-29 15:49:53.120524295 +0100
+++ gcc/cprop.c 2012-11-29 15:50:01.421547832 +0100
@@ -1499,6 +1499,7 @@ bypass_block (basic_block bb, rtx setcc,
int may_be_loop_header;
unsigned removed_p;
unsigned i;
+ unsigned n_latch_edges;
edge_iterator ei;
insn = (setcc != NULL) ? setcc : jump;
@@ -1510,13 +1511,12 @@ bypass_block (basic_block bb, rtx setcc,
if (note)
find_used_regs (&XEXP (note, 0), NULL);
- may_be_loop_header = false;
+ n_latch_edges = 0;
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
if (e->flags & EDGE_DFS_BACK)
- {
- may_be_loop_header = true;
- break;
- }
+ n_latch_edges++;
+
+ may_be_loop_header = n_latch_edges > 0;
change = 0;
for (ei = ei_start (bb->preds); (e = ei_safe_edge (ei)); )
@@ -1605,7 +1605,8 @@ bypass_block (basic_block bb, rtx setcc,
&& dest != EXIT_BLOCK_PTR)
{
if (current_loops != NULL
- && e->src->loop_father->latch == e->src)
+ && (e->src->loop_father->latch == e->src
+ || n_latch_edges > 1))
{
/* ??? Now we are creating (or may create) a loop
with multiple entries. Simply mark it for
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr54838.c.mp 2012-11-26 14:48:43.783980854 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr54838.c 2012-11-26 14:49:51.051158719 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* PR middle-end/54838 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-forward-propagate -ftracer" } */
+
+void bar (void);
+
+void
+foo (void *b, int *c)
+{
+again:
+ switch (*c)
+ {
+ case 1:
+ if (!b)
+ {
+ bar ();
+ return;
+ }
+ goto again;
+ case 3:
+ if (!b)
+ goto again;
+ }
+}
Marek