Rainer Orth writes: > "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com> writes:
>> We don't have a maintainer is a problem, not go upstream first. > Agreed. I've no idea if the SC appointed one when it accepted > libsanitizer etc. into GCC. Instead of guessing and complaining about the GCC SC, have you two thought of actually looking at the announcement? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-11/msg00016.html ASAN refers to both the GCC bits and libsanitizer. The appointed maintainers should have added their names to the GCC MAINTAINERS file. And, H.J, you should not try to merge things that you do not understand. Thanks, David
