Now that we have two code paths, the testsuite needs to be adjusted.

Committed as obvious.
commit 1cfee58f7559592cc21e8c68754a1c0093c5876d
Author: Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Nov 9 12:42:00 2012 -0600

    +       * g++.dg/tm/pr47530-2.C: Adjust for uninstrumented code path.
    +       * g++.dg/tm/pr47530.C: Same.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index e888313..fa0919e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2012-11-09  Aldy Hernandez  <al...@redhat.com>
+
+       * g++.dg/tm/pr47530-2.C: Adjust for uninstrumented code path.
+       * g++.dg/tm/pr47530.C: Same.
+
 2012-11-09  Jason Merrill  <ja...@redhat.com>
 
        PR c++/54859
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47530-2.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47530-2.C
index c98e07e..bcfdbe9 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47530-2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47530-2.C
@@ -31,5 +31,9 @@ void bench_test()
     }
 }
 
-// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "ITM_commitTransaction.*tail call" 0 
"tmedge" } }
+// There should be two calls to commitTransaction.
+// The one in the uninstrumented code path is a tail call.
+// The one in the instrumented code path is not.
+// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "ITM_commitTransaction.*tail call" 1 
"tmedge" } }
+
 // { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "tmedge" } }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47530.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47530.C
index 8e7e272..6a9fb1b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47530.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47530.C
@@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ void LinkedList::insert(int val)
   }
 }
 
-// Make sure we don't do tail optimization on the commit.
-// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "commitTransaction...; .tail call" 0 
"optimized" } }
+// Make sure we don't do tail optimization on the commit, except on
+// the uninstrumented code path.
+// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "commitTransaction...; .tail call" 1 
"optimized" } }
 // { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } }
 

Reply via email to