Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 2012-11-09 07:18, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> I think it actually should be removed, given that e.g.
>> int i, j;
>> void
>> foo (void)
>> {
>> __atomic_store (&i, &j, 12);
>> }
>> warns twice for the same thing, when it should only warn once.
>> Richard?
>
> Makes sense.Ok, I'll remove it completely and fix the ChangeLog. Thanks. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
