On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote: > I'll do some testing of the fix below, but do you have any comments on > the correctness or the potential issue I raised (see my note just > below the patch)?
Sorry, I don't know the pro- and epilogue threading code well enough to be of any help to you... > Do you recommend pursuing the move of the bb partition phase until > later, after we leave cfglayout mode? I need to revisit to see if my > prologue/epilogue fix below also addresses the issue I saw when I > tried moving it. I think it should not be moved, cfglayout mode is the natural mode for this kind of CFG transformations. But someone will have to tackle the force_nonfallthru issue. Ciao! Steven
