On 10/30/12, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: > On Oct 30, 2012 Bin.Cheng <amker.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just one question: Should we change the name of functions > > "sbitmap_intersection_of_succs/sbitmap_intersection_of_preds/ > > sbitmap_union_of_succs/sbitmap_union_of_preds" too? It might > > be a little confusing that sbitmap_* is used among bitmap_*. > > Yes. Lawrence is proceeding with this unification in stages. > The next few patches should rename these.
Actually, I didn't know about them because they are auxillary routines declared outside of the bitmap files. I've gone ahead and changed them as well. > The only two sets of functions that will remain separate for > now are the iterators and the bitmap creation routines, I think. > Lawrence? The iterator functions have been unified, but not the iterator type names. -- Lawrence Crowl
