> However, I'm going to have to pause integration of further patches from > Jim until he either starts including a DCO signoff in the patch itself, > adds himself to the DCO section of the MAINTAINERS file or gets an > past/future assignment in place with the FSF. While none of the > patches individually are significant from a copyright standpoint, the > aggregate of the patches probably does push us into the significant from > a copyright standpoint.
IIRC andestech has signed company-wise copyright assignment for GNU toolchains? He still needs DCO signoff even if they have that? > > Jeff >
