On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 3:50 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: MITSUNARI Shigeo <[email protected]> > > Ping. > > v8 was posted on Jun 19 and I have not seen any further comments, so a > gentle ping. For convenience, the current state: > > - [1/2] expmed: all five points from the v6 review are addressed, and > v8 fixes the sign-compare bootstrap failure the Linaro tcwg CI hit on > v7 (classic_cost is now unsigned, per Andrew's suggestion). There are > no outstanding review comments that I am aware of. > > - [2/2] i386: adds the BMI2 MULX highpart pattern; unchanged since v5. > > The two parts touch different areas ([1/2] middle-end/expmed, [2/2] > i386), so they likely need separate acks. Jeff, would [1/2] be OK for > trunk, or is anything else needed? For [2/2] I would appreciate a look > from an x86 maintainer.
I already approved 2/2 a while ago [1]. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-June/719916.html Uros.
