From: MITSUNARI Shigeo <[email protected]>

Ping.

v8 was posted on Jun 19 and I have not seen any further comments, so a
gentle ping.  For convenience, the current state:

- [1/2] expmed: all five points from the v6 review are addressed, and
  v8 fixes the sign-compare bootstrap failure the Linaro tcwg CI hit on
  v7 (classic_cost is now unsigned, per Andrew's suggestion).  There are
  no outstanding review comments that I am aware of.

- [2/2] i386: adds the BMI2 MULX highpart pattern; unchanged since v5.

The two parts touch different areas ([1/2] middle-end/expmed, [2/2]
i386), so they likely need separate acks.  Jeff, would [1/2] be OK for
trunk, or is anything else needed?  For [2/2] I would appreciate a look
from an x86 maintainer.

Thanks,
Shigeo

Reply via email to