From: Chao-ying Fu <[email protected]>

Ensure the proper sub-word address is computed 
when using built-in atomics on big-endian RISC-V targets.

Without this change, multiple tests were failing, including:
    libatomic.c/atomic-compare-exchange-1.c 
    libatomic.c/atomic-compare-exchange-2.c 
    libatomic.c/atomic-exchange-1.c 
    libatomic.c/atomic-exchange-2.c 
    libatomic.c/atomic-op-1.c 
    libatomic.c/atomic-op-2.c 
    libatomic.c/generic-2.c 
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-3.c 
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-4.c 
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-5.c 
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-6.c 
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-7.c 
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-8.c 

The patch was tested using QEMU modified to run big-endian RISC-V
executables [1]. 

[1] https://github.com/djtodoro/qemu/tree/riscvbe/current#

Signed-off-by: Aleksa Paunovic <[email protected]>

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_subword_address): Add emit_move_insn for 
big-endian.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c: New test.
        * gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c: New test.
---
Changes in v4:
- Drop the second and the third patches. 
- XFAIL the tests if RVV is enabled on big-endian builds instead of skipping.
- Compile the tests with -O0 to avoid potential DCE issues.
- Link to v3: 
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/cover/[email protected]/

---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc                              |  5 +++++
 .../gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c   | 10 ++++++++++
 .../gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c   | 10 ++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c
 create mode 100644 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index bd0046ad2e8..f0a6e43a182 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -11969,6 +11969,11 @@ riscv_subword_address (rtx mem, rtx *aligned_mem, rtx 
*shift, rtx *mask,
   /* Calculate the shift amount.  */
   emit_move_insn (*shift, gen_rtx_AND (SImode, gen_lowpart (SImode, addr),
                                       gen_int_mode (3, SImode)));
+  if (TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN)
+    emit_move_insn (*shift, gen_rtx_XOR (SImode, *shift,
+                                       gen_int_mode (GET_MODE (mem) == QImode
+                                                     ? 3 : 2, SImode)));
+
   emit_move_insn (*shift, gen_rtx_ASHIFT (SImode, *shift,
                                          gen_int_mode (3, SImode)));
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..41e96dd583e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-mbig-endian -O0" } */
+/* { dg-xfail-if "RVV is currently broken on big-endian RISC-V builds" { 
riscv*-*-* } { "-march=rv*v*" } } */
+/* Verify that subword atomic operations use XOR for big-endian halfword 
alignment.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "xori\\s+\[a-z0-9\]+,\[a-z0-9\]+,2" } } */
+
+void atomic_fetch_add_hi(short *ptr, short val)
+{
+  __atomic_fetch_add(ptr, val, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4e801140f96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-mbig-endian -O0" } */
+/* { dg-xfail-if "RVV is currently broken on big-endian RISC-V builds" { 
riscv*-*-* } { "-march=rv*v*" } } */
+/* Verify that subword atomic operations use XOR for big-endian byte 
alignment.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "xori\\s+\[a-z0-9\]+,\[a-z0-9\]+,3" } } */
+
+void atomic_fetch_add_qi(char *ptr, char val)
+{
+  __atomic_fetch_add(ptr, val, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+}
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to