I was about to fix this but did not have time yet, so thank you!

To me the patch looks fine. I add Joseph (C FE maintainer)
for review.

Martin

Am Mittwoch, dem 17.06.2026 um 22:12 -0700 schrieb Kees Cook:
> PR123569 fixed wrong code with the counted_by attribute on a pointer
> member by suppressing creation of the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE wrapper in the
> parser's pre/post-increment paths, and added a checking assertion in
> build_unary_op to ensure no .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE call reaches it.
> 
> The other rvalue-consuming unary operators (!, -, +) still
> rvalue-convert their operand via convert_lvalue_to_rvalue, which
> produces the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE wrapper as before.  They then reach
> parser_build_unary_op then build_unary_op carrying the wrapper and
> trip the assertion.  A minimal reproducer:
> 
>   struct s {
>     int n;
>     char *p __attribute__((__counted_by__(n)));
>   };
>   int f (struct s *o) { return !o->p; }
> 
> Unwrap the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE call at the top of build_unary_op via
> get_ref_from_access_with_size.  These unary operators consume the
> pointer rvalue rather than the pointed-to data, so the bounds-checking
> wrapper is not useful here.  The assertion is retained: after the unwrap
> it documents the post-condition the rest of the function relies on.
> 
>       PR c/123569
> 
> gcc/c/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * c-typeck.cc (build_unary_op): Unwrap .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE
>       from the operand before further processing.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * gcc.dg/counted-by-unary.c: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/counted-by-unary.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  gcc/c/c-typeck.cc                       | 12 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/counted-by-unary.c
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/counted-by-unary.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/counted-by-unary.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b16b819d63b6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/counted-by-unary.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/* Verify that unary operators that rvalue-convert a counted_by-annotated
> +   pointer access do not ICE.  The original PR123569 fix suppressed the
> +   .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE wrapper creation for ++/-- (which keep an lvalue);
> +   the rvalue-consuming ops (!, -, +) still receive the wrapper and must
> +   strip it in build_unary_op.  */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-std=c99" } */
> +
> +struct s {
> +    int n;
> +    char *p __attribute__((__counted_by__(n)));
> +};
> +
> +int test_not (struct s *o)    { return !o->p; }
> +long test_neg (struct s *o)   { return -(long)o->p; }
> +long test_plus (struct s *o)  { return +(long)o->p; }
> +
> +extern void abort (void);
> +
> +int main (void) {
> +    char buf[4] = { 0 };
> +    struct s s = { .n = 4, .p = buf };
> +    if (test_not (&s) != 0)  abort ();    /* p is non-null */
> +
> +    struct s e = { .n = 0, .p = (void*)0 };
> +    if (test_not (&e) != 1)  abort ();    /* p is null */
> +
> +    /* test_neg / test_plus must just compile and run without ICE.  */
> +    (void) test_neg (&s);
> +    (void) test_plus (&s);
> +    return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
> index 6bce8c427543..0f96de200743 100644
> --- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
> +++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
> @@ -5779,6 +5779,18 @@ build_unary_op (location_t location, enum tree_code 
> code, tree xarg,
>    tree eptype = NULL_TREE;
>    const char *invalid_op_diag;
>  
> +  /* If ARG is wrapped in a call to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE (created when the
> +     C parser rvalue-converts a counted_by-annotated member access, see
> +     PR123569) unwrap it here.  Unary operators that consume an rvalue
> +     (!, -, +) read the value itself rather than dereferencing into the
> +     pointed-to data, so the bounds-checking wrapper is unnecessary and
> +     would otherwise reach build_unary_op while it is not equipped to
> +     handle the wrapped form.  PR123569 fixed the ++/-- side of this by
> +     suppressing wrapper creation in the parser; the rvalue-consuming
> +     ops still receive the wrapper and need to strip it here.  */
> +  if (is_access_with_size_p (arg))
> +    xarg = arg = get_ref_from_access_with_size (arg);
> +
>    gcc_checking_assert (!is_access_with_size_p (arg));
>  
>    bool int_operands = EXPR_INT_CONST_OPERANDS (xarg);

Reply via email to