Hi Mike, On 01/04/26 11:14 AM, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 10:31:16AM +0530, jeevitha wrote: >> Gentle Ping! >> >> Thanks & Regards >> Jeevitha >> >> >> On 10/03/26 11:42 pm, jeevitha wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patch depends on the -mcpu=future and ISA 3.0 AMO implementation >>> patches and will be upstreamed after those patches are upstreamed. >>> These changes have been bootstrapped and regression tested on >>> powerpc64le-linux. >>> >>> This patch adds support for compare-and-swap-equal atomic memory >>> operations that may be added to a future PowerPC processor. Note that >>> the names of these functions may change in the future. >>> >>> Add _AMO_LD_CS_EQ to the _AMO_LD enum and define four new >>> compare-and-swap equal helper functions, all guarded by _ARCH_FUTURE. >>> For non-Future targets, provide error-attribute stubs to emit a >>> compile-time diagnostic. > > Please update gcc/doc/extend.texi to include these new built-in > functions. >
I believe the extend.texi should be updated only after we finalize the name of the 'future' processor and the ISA version on which the future processor will be based upon. This is because the extend.texi document specifies both the processor name and the ISA version. I don't think we want to specify the term 'future' in extend.texi. -Surya
