On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 11:18:52AM +0530, Jason Merrill wrote:
> The comment suggests that the problem is that METHOD_TYPE isn't
> canonicalized properly, but build_method_type_directly sure seems to work to
> do that, so perhaps the comment is obsolete and we can just return -1?

I'll test it tonight, forgot to do that yesterday.

        Jakub

Reply via email to