[CC += Branden] Hi David,
On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 07:09:34PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Sun, 2025-09-28 at 10:09 +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> > > --- > > gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc > > index a771444184f..e5e3ef70710 100644 > > --- a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc > > +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc > > @@ -3505,7 +3505,7 @@ warn_parms_array_mismatch (location_t origloc, > > tree fndecl, tree newparms) > > > > if (!newa) > > { > > - /* Continue of both parameters are pointers with no size > > + /* Continue if both parameters are pointers with no size > > associated with it. */ > > if (!cura) > > continue; > > Hi Alejandro. > > Thanks for the patches. I think this kind of spelling fix is covered > by the "obvious" rule on https://gcc.gnu.org/gitwrite.html#all though > you'll need a ChangeLog for the server-side hooks to accept it the > push. Thanks! Though I don't have write access (I don't have an account). I'll add a changelog and resend. > That said, perhaps the wording makes more sense if it's > "associated with them" > rather than > "associated with it" > ? (I'm not sure) I'm not sure either. I've CCed Branden, who will probably know. > Hope this is constructive > Dave Yup. Thanks! Have a lovely night! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es> Use port 80 (that is, <...:80/>).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
