On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 11:56 PM Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2025, 7:30 AM YunQiang Su <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Richard Biener <[email protected]> 于2025年9月24日周三 20:36写道： >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 5:56 AM Andrew Pinski >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > This is the next patch in the series of removing fab. >> > > This one is simplier than builtin_constant_p because the only >> > > time we want to simplify this builtin is at the final folding step. >> > > >> > > Note align-5.c needs to change slightly as __builtin_assume_aligned >> > > is no longer taken into account for the same reason as why PR 111875 >> > > is closed as invalid and why the testcase is failing at -Og >> > > I added a new testcase align-5a.c where the pointer is explictly aligned >> > > so that the check is gone there. >> > > Note __builtin_assume_aligned should really be instrumented for UBSAN, >> > > I filed PR 122038 for that. >> > > >> > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. >> > >> >> With this patch, this test case fails on riscv64-linux-gnu >> gcc.target/riscv/cmo-zicboz-zic64-1.c > > > Can you file a bug report and i will look into it when I get back home from > the cauldron?
I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122086 . I will produce a patch by the end of next week. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > > >> >> >> -- >> YunQiang Su
