On Sun, 2025-09-28 at 10:09 +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> > --- > gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc > index a771444184f..e5e3ef70710 100644 > --- a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc > +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc > @@ -3505,7 +3505,7 @@ warn_parms_array_mismatch (location_t origloc, > tree fndecl, tree newparms) > > if (!newa) > { > - /* Continue of both parameters are pointers with no size > + /* Continue if both parameters are pointers with no size > associated with it. */ > if (!cura) > continue;
Hi Alejandro. Thanks for the patches. I think this kind of spelling fix is covered by the "obvious" rule on https://gcc.gnu.org/gitwrite.html#all though you'll need a ChangeLog for the server-side hooks to accept it the push. That said, perhaps the wording makes more sense if it's "associated with them" rather than "associated with it" ? (I'm not sure) Hope this is constructive Dave
