On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 2:49 PM Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 10:04, Tomasz Kamiński <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > v2: Moves change from std::indirect to std::__indirect to first patch, > > Ah, invoke ... I was confused what this had to do with std::indirect! :-) > I have no idea why indirect was on my mind., > > > so second patch is plain move, without sneaky changes. > > Patch 3 is not modified. > > > > I haven't implemented Nathan suggestions to use enum instead of bool, > > in my opinion this add miniscule compile time for no user benefit. > > And we already provide _Bind_front_t and _Bind_back_t aliases that > > should be used instead of _Binder directly. > > I agree that 'bool _Back' is clear enough for an internal API, the > name `_Back` explains what it's for, without polluting the enclosing > namespace with the _Front and _Back enumerators. > > This doesn't conflict with Nathan's NTTP patches, right? > I think it should not at all.
