On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 10:04, Tomasz Kamiński <[email protected]> wrote: > > v2: Moves change from std::indirect to std::__indirect to first patch,
Ah, invoke ... I was confused what this had to do with std::indirect! :-) > so second patch is plain move, without sneaky changes. > Patch 3 is not modified. > > I haven't implemented Nathan suggestions to use enum instead of bool, > in my opinion this add miniscule compile time for no user benefit. > And we already provide _Bind_front_t and _Bind_back_t aliases that > should be used instead of _Binder directly. I agree that 'bool _Back' is clear enough for an internal API, the name `_Back` explains what it's for, without polluting the enclosing namespace with the _Front and _Back enumerators. This doesn't conflict with Nathan's NTTP patches, right?
