After commit 51b85dfeb19652bf3e0aaec08828ba7cee1e641c, when the pointer
offset is a variable in the loop, the object size of point may also need
to be reexamined.
Which make gcc_assert in the check_for_plus_in_loops failed.

gcc/ChangeLog:

        tree-object-size.cc (check_for_plus_in_loops): Skip check for
        the variable offset

Signed-off-by: Linsen Zhou <[email protected]>
---

Related Alpine Linux issues:

https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/issues/17416  
https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/87912  

 gcc/tree-object-size.cc | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree-object-size.cc b/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
index 8545eff61a3..413e67a8125 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
@@ -2147,10 +2147,9 @@ check_for_plus_in_loops (struct object_size_info *osi, 
tree var)
       tree basevar = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
       tree cst = gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt);
 
-      gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (cst) == INTEGER_CST);
-
       /* Skip non-positive offsets.  */
-      if (integer_zerop (cst) || compare_tree_int (cst, offset_limit) > 0)
+      if (TREE_CODE (cst) != INTEGER_CST
+         || integer_zerop (cst) || compare_tree_int (cst, offset_limit) > 0)
         return;
 
       osi->depths[SSA_NAME_VERSION (basevar)] = 1;
-- 
2.51.0



-- 
Lindsay Zhou
https://lin.moe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to