On 8/20/25 7:36 AM, Paul-Antoine Arras wrote:
Call check_effective_target_riscv_zvfh_ok rather than
check_effective_target_riscv_zvfh in vx_vf_*run-1-f16.c run tests and ensure
that they are actually run.
Also fix remove_options_for_riscv_zvfh.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfmacc-run-1-f16.c: Call
check_effective_target_riscv_zvfh_ok rather than
check_effective_target_riscv_zvfh.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfmadd-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfmsac-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfmsub-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfnmacc-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfnmadd-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfnmsac-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfnmsub-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfwmacc-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfwmsac-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfwnmacc-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vx_vf/vf_vfwnmsac-run-1-f16.c: Likewise.
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_riscv_zvfh_ok): Append
zvfh instead of v to march.
(remove_options_for_riscv_zvfh): Remove duplicate and
call remove_ rather than add_options_for_riscv_z_ext.
Thanks for taking care of this. I'm confident the CI failures reported
on your patch are unrelated to your patch.
jeff
