> Am 05.07.2025 um 12:19 schrieb Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddh...@gotplt.org>:
>
> On 2025-07-05 02:45, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>> Am 04.07.2025 um 19:57 schrieb Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddh...@gotplt.org>:
>>>
>>> On 2025-07-04 08:12, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-07-04 08:08, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>>>
>>>> I forgot to add the PR number to the ChangeLog entries, I've fixed it in
>>>> my commit message.
>>>>> * tree-object-size.cc (is_access_with_size): New function.
>>>>> (collect_object_sizes_for): Use it.
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>>
>>>>> * gcc.dg/pr120929.c: New test case.
>>>
>>> Testing:
>>>
>>> - x86_64 bootstrap and test, no new regressions
>>> - i686 build and test, no new regressions
>>> - ubsan config bootstrap OK
>> My point in the PR still stands.
>
> OK, should I revert right away or can we wait till Qing returns on Monday?
Monday is OK with me.
Richard
>
> Thanks,
> Sid
