On 2025-07-05 02:45, Richard Biener wrote:
Am 04.07.2025 um 19:57 schrieb Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddh...@gotplt.org>:
On 2025-07-04 08:12, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On 2025-07-04 08:08, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
I forgot to add the PR number to the ChangeLog entries, I've fixed it in my
commit message.
* tree-object-size.cc (is_access_with_size): New function.
(collect_object_sizes_for): Use it.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/pr120929.c: New test case.
Testing:
- x86_64 bootstrap and test, no new regressions
- i686 build and test, no new regressions
- ubsan config bootstrap OK
My point in the PR still stands.
OK, should I revert right away or can we wait till Qing returns on Monday?
Thanks,
Sid
