It is really cool that you're tackling all this.  It looks like you're
running into some of the things I ran into: getting it perfect is hard,
and if you do, it's expensive.  Glad you're looking into it.

Also, loved the switch rewrite you did in vr-values.c.  That whole file really
needs rangerification.

> +// This routine will take the bounds [LB, UB], and apply the bitmask to those
> +// values such that both bounds satisfy the bitmask.  TRUE is returned
> +// if either bound changes, and they are retuirned as [NEW_LB,
> NEW_UB].

*returned*

> +  // Npw make sure each subrange endpoint matches the bitmask.

*Now*

Thanks.
Aldy

Reply via email to