On 5/6/25 13:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:28:16PM +0200, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:Mostly because it would make the print more noisy, and because by the time we have 4 billion prime paths, all systems would probably already have been crushed under the load of computing them.I'm happy to change to fmt_size_t everywhere, of course, but the use of size_t for pathno was my own automatic default type.Ok either way. Jakub
Pushed. Thanks, Jørgen
