On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:28:16PM +0200, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: > Mostly because it would make the print more noisy, and because by the time > we have 4 billion prime paths, all systems would probably already have been > crushed under the load of computing them. > > I'm happy to change to fmt_size_t everywhere, of course, but the use of > size_t for pathno was my own automatic default type.
Ok either way.
Jakub
