On 5/6/25 7:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
While the r15-521 commit was meant for trunk only:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:30:48AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Hmm, maybe maybe_clone_body shouldn't clear DECL_SAVED_TREE for aliases, but
rather set it to some stub like void_node?
Though with all these changes, it's probably better to go with your first
patch for GCC 14 and delay this approach to 15. Your v1 patch is OK for 14.
it apparently didn't need any follow-ups I could find and fixes numerous
regressions (PR119305, PR117813, PR109464).
As 14 branch has a one-off for these cases, something neither 13 nor 15+
do, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to use the 15+ code there.
Bootstrapped/regtested 14 branch on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for 14
branch?
OK.
Jason
