Ping! Can we backport this to 15 please?
Regards,
Jerry
On 4/18/25 6:35 PM, Jerry D wrote:
On 4/18/25 5:48 PM, Jerry D wrote:
I will be committing a fix for this to the 16 mainline tonight.
I am requesting Release Manager approval to push to 15 release branch
after full testing here.
Regards,
Jerry
See attached diff.
2025-04-18 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/119836
* resolve.cc(check_pure_function, pure_subroutine): Fix checking for
an impure subprogram within a DO CONCURRENT construct.
2025-04-18 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/119836
* gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_all_clauses.f90: Remove invalid
dg-error test.
* gfortran.dg/pr119836_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/pr119836_2.f90: Ditto.
* gfortran.dg/pr119836_3.f90: Ditto.
* gfortran.dg/pr119836_4.f90: Ditto.
I have committed to 16 and the backport to 15 is ready to go pending RM
approval.
Best Regards,
Jerry
commit 5927077029d61fdd32531530b9568cf6949fe0dd (HEAD -> gcc15)
Author: Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Fri Apr 18 18:05:10 2025 -0700
Fortran: Fix checking for IMPURE in DO CONCURRENT.
PR fortran/119836
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* resolve.cc (check_pure_function): Fix checking for
an impure subprogram within a DO CONCURRENT construct.
(pure_subroutine): Ditto.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_all_clauses.f90: Remove invalid
dg-error test.
* gfortran.dg/pr119836_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/pr119836_2.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/pr119836_3.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/pr119836_4.f90: New test.
(cherry picked from commit f9ea46d946887a05d7ecbca5aeeb99fd868f6e70)
