On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 8:10 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 06:04:29PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > > That's one option, but maybe it's better the other way round: instead of > > excluding known-bad targets, restrict cobol to known-good ones > > (i.e. x86_64-*-linux* and aarch64-*-linux*) instead. > > > > I've been using the following for this (should be retested for safety). > > I admit I don't really know what works and what doesn't out of the box now, > but your patch looks reasonable to me for 15 branch. > > Richard, Robert and/or James, do you agree?
I agree to restrict =all to enable cobol only for known-good platform triples. But IIRC that's what libgcobol configure.tgt does - IIRC intent was to allow a cobol build with explicit 'cobol' included even when configure.tgt claims unsupported? So why's *-*solaris now included in =all? I'm a bit confused, I thought we had =all restricted already. Richard. > > 2025-03-17 Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> > > > > PR cobol/119217 > > * configure.ac: Restrict cobol to aarch64-*-linux*, > > x86_64-*-linux*. > > * configure: Regenerate. > > Jakub >
