On 4/14/25 11:30 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Apr 14, 2025, Peter Bergner <berg...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > >> This is an architecture independent test case, so I'm surprised this >> doesn't FAIL on non-powerpc targets since they don't know anything >> about altivec. > > AFAICT we ignore attributes we don't know about. > > I'd think the following fix should help them too. > > I considered doing something like that, but I don't know whether the > modified test would trigger the original ICE. It seemed fragile, and > the change could sort of invalidate the regression test.
I have verified the modified test case ICEs with the exact same error as the original test case using the commit immediately before the commit the fixed the ICE. Peter
