On Apr 14, 2025, Peter Bergner <berg...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > This is an architecture independent test case, so I'm surprised this > doesn't FAIL on non-powerpc targets since they don't know anything > about altivec.
AFAICT we ignore attributes we don't know about. I'd think the following fix should help them too. I considered doing something like that, but I don't know whether the modified test would trigger the original ICE. It seemed fragile, and the change could sort of invalidate the regression test. I won't stand against this testcase modification, I'm just sharing the reasons why I didn't take this path. -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/ Free Software Activist FSFLA co-founder GNU Toolchain Engineer More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity. Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive!
