On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 08:55, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > > * Jonathan Wakely: > > >> I still think this is more confusing than necessary. If there isn't > >> some general rule that empty objects can be considered stateless, that > >> should be added somewhere, too. 8-) > > > > Could you submit an issue (or two)? > > https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#submit_issue > > Do you still need this because there is already a PR? > > [hash.requirements] clarify that Cpp17Hash does not imply stateless > <https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/7733>
I think we do need an LWG issue instead of an editorial tweak, but I'll take care of it.
