* Jonathan Wakely: >> I still think this is more confusing than necessary. If there isn't >> some general rule that empty objects can be considered stateless, that >> should be added somewhere, too. 8-) > > Could you submit an issue (or two)? > https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#submit_issue
Do you still need this because there is already a PR? [hash.requirements] clarify that Cpp17Hash does not imply stateless <https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/7733> Thanks, Florian
