On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 08:39:44AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > Looks pretty good. While it fixes a bug, we're actually in stage4 of the > development cycle. So with some exceptions we require the bug to be a > regression relative to earlier releases. > > We tend to make exceptions for cases where the code is incorrect or we > trigger an ICE, SEGV and the like. I don't think this meets the typical > exceptions. > > So it needs to wait before integrating. I've put it in the deferred queue, > but I've also put it in my tester. Both actions will help ensure it's not > forgotten once gcc-16 development opens. > Thank you for the feedback about it. Yes, it is not urgent, so there are no issues at all. Let's move it until GCC-16 development phase will open.
Best regards, Merzlyakov Alexey
