Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> >> Hmm, I wonder if we should just unconditionally call split_all_insns()
> >> at the start of md_reorg when -O0. This would address your problem, but
> >> have the added benefit that the length calculations would be more
> >> accurate. We're going to have to split the insns anyway during output,
> >> so why not get it over and done with...
OK, here's a patch to implement this solution, which does indeed fix my
original problem as well.
Tested on arm-linux-gnueabi with no regressions.
OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Ulrich
ChangeLog:
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_reorg): Ensure all insns are split.
Index: gcc/config/arm/arm.c
===================================================================
*** gcc/config/arm/arm.c (revision 189459)
--- gcc/config/arm/arm.c (working copy)
*************** arm_reorg (void)
*** 13359,13364 ****
--- 13359,13371 ----
if (TARGET_THUMB2)
thumb2_reorg ();
+ /* Ensure all insns that must be split have been split at this point.
+ Otherwise, the pool placement code below may compute incorrect
+ insn lengths. Note that when optimizing, all insns have already
+ been split at this point. */
+ if (!optimize)
+ split_all_insns_noflow ();
+
minipool_fix_head = minipool_fix_tail = NULL;
/* The first insn must always be a note, or the code below won't
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com
