I'm not sure how to verify that adding the parameter won't destroy the test.
I've tried to repoduce the ICE on old Arm builds of arm-none-eabi, but none of
them ICE. I suppose it should be safe to add the parameter as the PR talks
about the literal pools.
Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-14?
--
Without this change, build fails with:
.../thumb2-slow-flash-data-3.c: In function 'fn3':
.../thumb2-slow-flash-data-3.c:23:3: error: too many arguments to function 'fn1'
.../thumb2-slow-flash-data-3.c:10:6: note: declared here
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/arm/thumb2-slow-flash-data-3.c: Added argument to
fn1 to avoid compile error.
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com>
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb2-slow-flash-data-3.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb2-slow-flash-data-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb2-slow-flash-data-3.c
index 09d25d62002..eb841367c91 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb2-slow-flash-data-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb2-slow-flash-data-3.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
/* From PR71607 */
float b;
-void fn1 ();
+void fn1 (void*);
float
fn2 ()
--
2.25.1
