On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 at 07:20, Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com> wrote: > > While the regression was reported on GCC15, I'm sure that same > regression will be seen on GCC14 when it's tested in the > arm-linux-gnueabihf configuration. > > Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-14? > > -- > > This fixes reported regression at > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1407. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/arm/pr68620.c: Use effective-target arm_fp. > > Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com> > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr68620.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr68620.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr68620.c > index 6e38671752f..1ed84f4ac75 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr68620.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr68620.c > @@ -1,8 +1,10 @@ > /* { dg-do compile } */ > /* { dg-skip-if "-mpure-code supports M-profile without Neon only" { *-*-* } > { "-mpure-code" } } */ > /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_arch_v7a_ok } */ > -/* { dg-options "-mfp16-format=ieee -mfpu=auto -mfloat-abi=softfp" } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_fp_ok } */ > +/* { dg-options "-mfp16-format=ieee -mfpu=auto" } */ > /* { dg-add-options arm_arch_v7a } */ > +/* { dg-add-options arm_fp } */ >
So... this partially reverts your previous patch (bringing back arm_fp). What is the problem now? Thanks, Christophe > #include "arm_neon.h" > > -- > 2.25.1 >
