> Am 01.11.2024 um 11:13 schrieb Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Apparently tree_output_constant_def doesn't strictly guarantee that the
> returned VAR_DECL will have the same or uselessly convertible type as
> the type of the constant passed to it, compare_constants says:
>  /* For arrays, check that mode, size and storage order match.  */
>  /* For record and union constructors, require exact type equality.  */
> The older use of tree_output_constant_def in gimplify.cc was already
> handling this right:
>                ctor = tree_output_constant_def (ctor);
>                if (!useless_type_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (ctor)))
>                  ctor = build1 (VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, ctor);
> but the spot I've added for RAW_DATA_CST missed this.
> 
> So, the following patch adds that.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Ok

Richard 

> 2024-11-01  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>    PR middle-end/117384
>    * gimplify.cc (gimplify_init_ctor_eval): Add VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR around
>    rctor if it doesn't have expected type.
> 
>    * c-c++-common/init-7.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/gimplify.cc.jj    2024-10-25 10:00:29.471767814 +0200
> +++ gcc/gimplify.cc    2024-10-31 16:29:00.431732531 +0100
> @@ -5420,6 +5420,8 @@ gimplify_init_ctor_eval (tree object, ve
>          cref = build2 (MEM_REF, rtype, addr,
>                 build_int_cst (ptr_type_node, 0));
>          rctor = tree_output_constant_def (rctor);
> +          if (!useless_type_conversion_p (rtype, TREE_TYPE (rctor)))
> +        rctor = build1 (VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, rtype, rctor);
>          if (gimplify_expr (&cref, pre_p, NULL, is_gimple_lvalue,
>                 fb_lvalue) != GS_ERROR)
>        gimplify_seq_add_stmt (pre_p,
> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/init-7.c.jj    2024-10-31 16:52:59.845548100 
> +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/init-7.c    2024-10-31 16:58:20.050068483 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +/* PR middle-end/117384 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +
> +void baz (signed char *, unsigned char *);
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  signed char b[] = {
> +    44, 28, 12, 96, 80, 64, 48, 32, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
> +    9, 24, 39, 54, 69, 84, 99, 114, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36
> +  };
> +  baz (b, 0);
> +}
> +
> +void
> +bar (void)
> +{
> +  unsigned char b[] = {
> +    44, 28, 12, 96, 80, 64, 48, 32, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
> +    9, 24, 39, 54, 69, 84, 99, 114, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36,
> +    53, 36, 19, 102, 85, 68, 51, 34, 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, 102, 19, 36
> +  };
> +  baz (0, b);
> +}
> 
>    Jakub
> 

Reply via email to