Hi Joseph,

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 08:44:15PM GMT, Joseph Myers wrote:
> I don't see the use of pedwarn_c23 and associated tests (error with 
> -std=c23 -pedantic-errors, warning with -std=c23 -pedantic, no diagnostic 
> with -std=c23 -pedantic-errors -Wno-c23-c2y-compat, no diagnostic with 
> -std=c2y -pedantic-errors, warning with -std=c2y -pedantic-errors 
> -Wc23-c2y-compat), previously discussed in comments on v13, that would be 
> appropriate before considering this for inclusion with an appropriate 
> substitution of names.

I removed it because I renamed it to __countof__, which is a GNU
extension, and thus should not be warned by -Wpedantic.  As part of my
opposition to _Lengthof, I will not provide you with that part, which
would amount to basically giving you _Lengthof but not.  As part of the
editorialising process, you'll also have to add pedantic warnings, if
that's what you want to do.  Again, I will earnestly ask to once more to
consider __countof__, but it's up to you.

Have a lovely night!
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to