> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2024 3:20 AM
> 
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024, Haochen Jiang wrote:
> > Sorry for the disturb since I mis-typoed gcc-patches to gcc-patchs,
> > resend the patch.
> 
> No worries.
> 
> > This patch will add documentation for recent update in x86-64 backend.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> > +  <li>Xeon Phi CPUs support (a.k.a. Knight Landing and Knight Mill)
> > + were removed
> 
> I believe "Support for Xeon Phi CPUs" or "Xeon Phi CPU support" would be 
> better,
> though not 100% sure.
> 
> > +      in GCC 15. GCC will no longer accept <code>-mavx5124fmaps</code>,
> > +      <code>-mavx5124vnniw</code>, <code>-mavx512er</code>,
> > +      <code>-mavx512pf</code>, <code>-mprefetchwt1</code>,
> > +      <code>-march=knl</code>, <code>-march=knm</code>, <code>-
> mtune=knl</code>
> > +      or <code>-mtune=knm</code> compiler switches.
> 
> Is there a particular rationale for the order of switches? If not, I'd sort 
> them
> alphabetically (which is partially the case already) and start with -march=...
> 
> The patch is okay if you consider (which is not necessarily making) these 
> changes.

I will change them and commit them tomorrow if there is no objection.

Thx,
Haochen

> 
> Gerald

Reply via email to