On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going through the comments in http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33190
> one-by-one. This patch addresses comment #0. OK for trunk?
This is for comment #1:
PR other/33190
* doc/tm.texi.in: Document LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT.
* doc/tm.texi: Regenerate.
Index: doc/tm.texi.in
===================================================================
--- doc/tm.texi.in (revision 188983)
+++ doc/tm.texi.in (working copy)
@@ -6342,6 +6342,12 @@ Define this macro if it is as good or better to ca
function address than to call an address kept in a register.
@end defmac
+@defmac LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT
+Define this macro if a non-short-circuit operation produced by
+@samp{fold_range_test ()} is optimal. This macro defaults to true if
+@code{BRANCH_COST} is greater than or equal to the value 2.
+@end defmac
+
@hook TARGET_RTX_COSTS
This target hook describes the relative costs of RTL expressions.
Index: doc/tm.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/tm.texi (revision 188983)
+++ doc/tm.texi (working copy)
@@ -6414,6 +6414,12 @@ Define this macro if it is as good or better to ca
function address than to call an address kept in a register.
@end defmac
+@defmac LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT
+Define this macro if a non-short-circuit operation produced by
+@samp{fold_range_test ()} is optimal. This macro defaults to true if
+@code{BRANCH_COST} is greater than or equal to the value 2.
+@end defmac
+
@deftypefn {Target Hook} bool TARGET_RTX_COSTS (rtx @var{x}, int
@var{code}, int @var{outer_code}, int @var{opno}, int *@var{total},
bool @var{speed})
This target hook describes the relative costs of RTL expressions.
The patch merely fixes the missed target macro renaming doc change for
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg01473.html.
Committed as obvious.
Ciao!
Steven
