On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 2012-06-11 18:40, David Edelsohn wrote: > >> > Nope. I do see the obvious mistake in the atomic_load pattern though: > >> > The mode iterator should have been INT1 not INT. > > Did you want to commit the fix for the iterator? > > > > Applied the following to mainline. > > It ought to go onto the 4.7 branch as well, as it's a wrong-code bug. > Are we at a place in the 4.7.1 release process where that's possible?
If you are sure it won't break anything go ahead (sooner than later please). Thanks, Richard.
